Interview the shortlist, not the pile.
Hiring is won by speed and attention, and a pile of forty unread CVs kills both. Good candidates accept other offers while their application sits in your inbox. Screening is exactly the kind of structured, repetitive judgment that AI does well, with your criteria and your final call.
Today
Forty CVs per role, screened at midnight, good candidates gone before you reply.
After the fix
Every CV is screened against your criteria with notes. You interview the shortlist, not the pile.
A shortlist with notes, not a pile of PDFs
How it works day to day.
Every CV screened within the hour
Against the criteria you set: must-haves, nice-to-haves, red flags. Each one gets notes, not just a score.
A ranked shortlist, refreshed daily
You see the five worth your time, with reasoning you can check, while the role is still fresh.
Candidates hear back fast
Acknowledgements and polite passes go out promptly. Your employer brand stops paying for your busy weeks.
What stays human here: The interviews, the final decision, and any judgment about culture and character.
How it plays out.
A growing services firm hiring for ops roles.
01 · The situation
Each opening drew ~40 CVs. The owner screened them late at night, so good candidates had accepted other offers before they heard back.
02 · What we set up
We set up screening against the owner’s own criteria: must-haves, nice-to-haves, and red flags. Every CV gets notes, not just a score, and a ranked shortlist refreshes daily. Acknowledgements and polite passes go out promptly.
03 · The outcome
The owner now interviews the five worth their time while the role is still fresh, with reasoning they can check. The employer brand stops paying for the weeks they were too busy to reply.
A composite illustration drawn from patterns we see, not a specific named client. Your audit puts your real numbers on it.
What is this one costing you?
Time your team loses
Rough numbers are fine.
Money you leave on the table
How much flows through each a month, and the slice you could recover.
≈ S$3,010/mo on the table, every month
S$910 in staff time (6 hrs/wk) + S$2,100 in missed revenue
Want help fixing it?
Leave your email. We'll send a few short questions to kick things off.
The audit shows where you’re losing most.
One session, numbers on every cost, ranked by what pays back first. Credited in full toward your first month.
Refunded if we find nothing you can act on.